Best Yelp Scrapers 2026 [No-code Edition]

Nathan Eshetu●
27 May 2026

●
31 min read

TL;DR

  1. I tested no-code Yelp scrapers across data, pricing, speed, scalability, and ease of use
  2. I skipped browser extensions, API-only tools, and desktop apps β€” only dedicated no-code scrapers with a Yelp template made the cut
  3. lobstr.io is the most complete option β€” most data fields, the fastest at 51 minutes per 1,000 results, and the only one with deduplication
  4. lobstr.io is also the only tool that pulls business emails directly from business websites
  5. Apify is not reliable β€” zero results twice on URL input, and a 37% failure rate in a single test run
  6. Bright Data returns rich data, but not reliable β€” 1 in 3 records came back missing, and two of its three scrapers returned zero results
  7. ScrapeHero Cloud is reliable for small runs and the only tool with rating_histogram β€” but not built for volume
  8. WebScraper.io is reliable for small runs β€” but the most expensive option on this list

Most no-code Yelp scrapers look like they'll work β€” until you actually run them.

Zero results. Partial data. No explanation why.

If you've been there, you're not alone.

Reddit post showing users asking about Yelp scraping tools and common failure issues

So I tested the best no-code Yelp scrapers β€” across data, pricing, speed, scalability, and ease of use β€” to save you the trial and error.

Here's what actually worked.

Criteria lobstr.io Apify Bright Data ScrapeHero Cloud WebScraper.io
Data fields 30 9 29 23 10
Data reliability πŸ’― πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘Ž πŸ’― πŸ’―
Email scraping βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
Entry price /1K $2.00 $1.00 $1.50 $8.33 $11
Scale price /1K $0.50 $1.00 $1.00 $2.50 $5.50
Free plan βœ… βœ… ❌ βœ… ❌
Speed /1K 51 min 2,667 min 94 min 308 min 182 min
CSV import βœ… ❌ βœ… ❌ βœ…
Concurrency slots βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ βœ…
Scalability βœ… ❌ ❌ βœ… βœ…
Stability πŸ’― πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘ πŸ’―
Deduplication βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
Scheduling βœ… βœ… ❌ βœ… βœ…
Export options πŸ‘ πŸ’― πŸ’― πŸ‘ πŸ‘
Integrations πŸ‘ πŸ’― πŸ’― πŸ’― πŸ’―
Customer support πŸ’― πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘

But hold up...is it legal?


⚠️ Disclaimer

The information in this section is for general informational purposes only. It reflects publicly available sources and my own interpretation of them.

It does not constitute legal advice and should not be treated as such. Laws vary by jurisdiction and can change.

If you need guidance on compliance, data use, contracts, or platform-specific risks, consult a qualified legal professional who can evaluate your situation in detail.

Yes β€” if you're collecting public data responsibly.

In the U.S., collecting publicly accessible Yelp data generally isn't treated as "hacking" under federal anti-hacking law, based on how the Ninth Circuit has interpreted it.

Where things get risky is what you do after you collect it.

Copying or republishing reviews and photos can raise copyright issues.

And if you use the data for profiling or marketing, privacy laws like GDPR or CCPA may applyβ€”especially when personal data is involved.

If the content is public, you're not bypassing technical barriers, and you use the data responsibly, you're usually on safer ground.

For a deeper breakdown, see the linked article.

Now, here's how I filtered the list down to the best scrapers.

How did I choose the best Yelp scrapers?

First, I looked at what people actually struggle with when scraping Yelp.

So I went straight to community threads and user reviews.
Community threads and user reviews about Yelp scraping pain points

From there, I narrowed it down to five recurring pain points:

  1. Data
  2. Affordability
  3. Scalability
  4. Speed
  5. Ease of use

For data, I checked what fields each tool returnsβ€”and whether the output is clean, flat, and usable right away without extra wrangling.

GIF showing data fields returned by a Yelp scraper in the output

For affordability, I reduced pricing to a simple metric: cost per 1,000 results.

I also compared both entry-level and higher-volume pricing so it stays fair whether you scrape occasionally or run jobs regularly.

GIF showing pricing comparison across Yelp scrapers normalized to cost per 1,000 results

For scalability, I measured both input scale and output scale. Input scale is bulk import and how well the workflow holds up with large URL lists.

For output scale, I convert speed into a monthly ceiling using 8h/day of active runtime (β‰ˆ14,400 min/month) to estimate how many results each tool can produce in a month.

Then I noted whether the tool has concurrency controls to push throughput, or if scaling is mostly linear.

For speed, I timed how long each tool took to return results and projected that to a 1,000-result run.

Screenshot showing speed test results across all five Yelp scrapers

For ease of use, I looked at the whole workflow β€” from setting up the first result to exporting the data β€” paying attention to input clarity, result limiting, scheduling, export options, and integrations.

I also checked customer support: what channels exist, and what real users say about them in reviews.

Screenshot of user reviews and community posts about Yelp scraper reliability and support quality

Next, I made a list of every tool I could find via Google and AI recommendations.

GIF showing a Google search for Yelp scraping tools and AI recommendations

Browser extensions and visual scrapers might work on lightly protected pages, but they're not reliable against a site like Yelp.

And API-only tools? You need to write code, who are we kidding.

So I excluded the usual suspectsβ€”visual scrapers, Chrome extensions, desktop apps, and API-only tools.

I'm only comparing no-code tools with dedicated templates.

Best Yelp scrapers

Criteria lobstr.io Apify Bright Data ScrapeHero Cloud WebScraper.io
Data fields 30 9 29 23 10
Data reliability πŸ’― πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘Ž πŸ’― πŸ’―
Email scraping βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
Entry price /1K $2.00 $1.00 $1.50 $8.33 $11
Scale price /1K $0.50 $1.00 $1.00 $2.50 $5.50
Free plan βœ… βœ… ❌ βœ… ❌
Speed /1K 51 min 2,667 min 94 min 308 min 182 min
CSV import βœ… ❌ βœ… ❌ βœ…
Concurrency slots βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ βœ…
Scalability βœ… ❌ ❌ βœ… βœ…
Stability πŸ’― πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘ πŸ’―
Deduplication βœ… ❌ ❌ ❌ ❌
Scheduling βœ… βœ… ❌ βœ… βœ…
Export options πŸ‘ πŸ’― πŸ’― πŸ‘ πŸ‘
Integrations πŸ‘ πŸ’― πŸ’― πŸ’― πŸ’―
Customer support πŸ’― πŸ‘ πŸ‘ πŸ‘Ž πŸ‘

Lobstr.io

lobstr.io is a French web scraping platform with 50+ ready-made scrapers, available as a no-code app or via API.
lobstr.io homepage showing the Yelp Search Export scraper page
Pros Cons
Only tool that pulls business emails Only CSV export
Most data fields
CSV import
Deduplication built in
Strong live chat support
Fastest
Concurrency slots

Key features

  1. 30 data fields per listing
  2. Collect Contacts toggle pulls business emails
  3. IS SPONSORED and ADVERTISER STATUS to identify and filter paid placements
  4. Bulk keyword + location upload via CSV
  5. Slots to control scraping speed and run multiple inputs in parallel
  6. Deduplication via unique results toggle
  7. Schedule recurring scrapes
  8. Export to CSV or deliver to Google Sheets, Amazon S3, SFTP, or email
  9. Integrates with Make.com and 3,000+ apps
  10. Cloud-based, no installation needed

Data

lobstr.io returns 30 fields per listing.

Here are all 30 fields:

πŸ”— URL πŸ“„ NAME ⭐ REVIEWS ⭐ SCORE
πŸ“Š IS CLOSED πŸ“Š ADVERTISER STATUS πŸ“Š IS SPONSORED πŸ’° PRICE
🏷️ CATEGORIES πŸ”— WEBSITE πŸ“ž PHONE πŸ”— YELP MENU
πŸ“ ADDRESS πŸ“Œ LAT πŸ“Œ LNG 🏷️ AMENITIES
πŸ“ NEIGHBORHOODS πŸ“… HOURS πŸ–ΌοΈ PHOTO URL πŸ“ž DIALABLE PHONE
πŸ“Š GEO ACCURACY πŸ“Š IS YELP GUARANTEED πŸ“ CROSS STREETS πŸ–ΌοΈ PHOTO COUNT
πŸ–ΌοΈ PHOTOS πŸ“Š IS PERMANENTLY CLOSED πŸ“Š IS ONLINE BUSINESS πŸ“ DESCRIPTION
πŸ–ΌοΈ LOGO URL πŸ‘€ EMAIL

lobstr.io has a few exclusive fields that no other tool on this list returns. Here are those fields:

| πŸ“Š IS SPONSORED | πŸ“Š ADVERTISER STATUS | πŸ”— YELP MENU | πŸ‘€ EMAIL |

IS SPONSORED and ADVERTISER STATUS let you flag paid placements directly in the output, so you can filter them out without a second pass.

It's useful when you're building a lead list and don't want to target advertisers.

YELP MENU returns a direct menu link per business β€” no additional request needed.

EMAIL isn't pulled from the Yelp page itself.

lobstr.io visits each business's own website to find it β€” meaning you get a contact address even when Yelp doesn't surface one.

Worth knowing: The EMAIL field is controlled by a single toggle: Collect Contacts

When it's off, EMAIL is blank across all rows.

When it's on, lobstr.io scrapes each business's website for an email address before writing the row.

collect contacts toggle

Affordability

lobstr.io runs on a credit-based subscription model. The cost per result depends on which features you enable.

Without Collect Contacts:

  1. FREE plan: 100 results per month
  2. STARTER plan: $2.00 per 1,000 results
  3. TEAM plan: $0.50 per 1,000 results
lobstr.io pricing page showing plans without Collect Contacts enabled

With Collect Contacts enabled:

  1. FREE plan: 50 results per month
  2. STARTER plan: $4.00 per 1,000 results
  3. TEAM plan: $1.00 per 1,000 results
lobstr.io pricing page showing plans with Collect Contacts enabled β€” cost doubles per result

The cost doubles when you turn on contact collection.

But it's the only tool on this list that pulls emails directly from business websites.

Scalability

lobstr.io handles large input and lets you push throughput when you need it faster.

On the input side, you upload keywords and locations in bulk via CSV.

lobstr.io scalability settings showing CSV upload

On the output side, at 51 minutes per 1,000 results, the baseline ceiling is roughly 282K results/month without contact collection.

With Collect Contacts on, it drops to 106K/month.
However, Slots are what make this scalable in practice.

Each Slot adds a parallel scraper, so multiple inputs run at the same time instead of moving through the queue one by one.

lobstr.io scalability settings showing CSV upload and Slots configuration
More concurrency means a larger job doesn't become an exponentially longer wait β€” you add Slots and keep runtime under control.

lobstr.io is stable at scale.

Concurrency via Slots gives throughput control, and credits are fixed per result so costs are predictable.
Output is consistent, and Max Unique Results caps the run upfront.

Ease of use

lobstr.io still uses a guided 4-step setup. It's hard to get lost.

You always know where you are and what comes next.

Task creation supports two ways to start:

With Smart filters on, there is a keyword workflow.

You enter a keyword and location (or upload a CSV for bulk jobs).

smart filter on interface
With Smart filters off, there is the URL workflow.

You paste a Yelp search URL and run that exact query.

smart filter off interface

So you can either build the search in lobstr.io, or bring your own pre-built Yelp search and let it do the extraction.

Settings give you real control.

Max Unique Results and Collect Contacts are both available upfront.

You can keep the run focused on Yelp data, or turn on contact collection when you need enriched lead information.

After that, it's filtersβ€”lots of them.

They let you decide what belongs in the export before you spend credits collecting it.

Price tiers ($ to $$$$) help you avoid the wrong market.

Sorting makes your intent explicit.

Distance and attribute toggles make the output less generic.

You can narrow by radius, then layer on flags like good for kids/groups, Wi-Fi, dogs allowed, accessibility, and payment methods.

distance and attributes gif
Unique Results is the real win here.

It handles deduplication automatically, so you're not paying for duplicates β€” or cleaning repeats after export.

Scheduling is built into the launch step. Minutes, hours, days, weeks, or months β€” configurable with timezone and start time.

Every day or every weekday. Simple, clear choices.

Scheduling interface

Getting the data out is straightforward.

Once a run finishes, you can export everything as a CSV.

If you want it to show up somewhere automatically, lobstr.io can push results to Google Sheets, Amazon S3, SFTP, or email.

Delivery options gif

And if this needs to plug into something bigger, the Make.com integration opens the door to 3,000+ other apps.

make.com integration

Speed

lobstr.io performed well in the speed test.

Without email collection, it returned 100 unique results in 5 minutes 06 seconds β€” roughly 51 minutes for 1,000 results.

With Collect Contacts turned on, the same 100 unique results took 13 minutes 38 seconds β€” roughly 136 minutes for 1,000 results.
lobstr.io speed test showing 100 unique results collected

That makes sense. Email collection adds extra work because the scraper has to visit business websites and look for contact details.

The speed is also adjustable.

lobstr.io lets you increase the number of Slots, meaning more scraping bots can run in parallel.
lobstr.io Slots setting interface showing how to increase parallel scraping bots
So if you need to process more inputs faster, you can raise Slots instead of waiting on one bot.

Customer support

lobstr.io offers customer support through a live chat pop-up directly on the website.

It's one of the few things users mention consistentlyβ€”and for once, it's not vague praise.

The team is typically quick to respond, technically competent, and actually helpful.

lobstr.io live chat support interface showing responsive and technically competent support

Best for

Pick this when Yelp is part of a real workflow β€” lead gen, outreach, market mapping β€” not a one-off experiment.

It's built for runs you'll repeat, lists you'll grow, and data you'll actually use.

If contact details matter at all, there's no comparison.

It's the only tool that visits each business's website to pull an email β€” and that changes what you can do with the output.


Apify

Apify is a cloud-based scraping platform with a marketplace of community-built scrapers β€” including a Yelp Scraper actor that extracts business details.
Apify homepage showing the Yelp Scraper actor page

Apify's marketplace is crowded, and quality varies a lot between actors.

For the comparison, I picked the Yelp actor with the most users. It's a quick sanity check that the actor is actively used.

Apify Yelp scraper marketplace showing available actors with user counts and the selected actor highlighted
If you've found a better Yelp actor on Apify, send it my way β€” I'll gladly retest and update the post.
Pros Cons
Free plan available Runs zero results
Export to CSV, JSON, and Excel Smallest data fields
Scheduling available No deduplication
No CSV import
Slowest
No concurrency control

Key features

  1. 9 data fields per listing
  2. Schedule recurring scrapes
  3. Export to CSV, JSON, and Excel
  4. Integrates with Make, Zapier, and n8n
  5. Cloud-based, no installation needed

Data

Apify returns 9 fields per listing β€” the fewest of the five tools.

Here are all 9 fields:

πŸ–ΌοΈ primaryPhoto πŸ“„ name 🏷️ type πŸ’° priceRange
🍽️ cuisine ⭐ aggregatedRating ⭐ reviewCount πŸ”— directUrl
πŸ”— website

Snapshot-level data β€” enough to identify a business and check its rating, not enough to contact it, map it, or qualify it further. There is no phone, no address, no coordinates, no hours, no claimed status, no amenities.

That said, the bigger problem isn't what's missingβ€”it's reliability.

In my test, a search URL returned zero results, while switching to keyword search returned three. I assumed I'd misconfigured something.

I hadn't. That was the output.

Apify data output
So I checked the Issues tab to see if it was just me. It wasn't.

Other users report the same patternβ€”zero output, missing reviews, phone numbers not pulling.

apify data output issues

That's not a missing feature. That's a failure mode.

Affordability

Apify uses a pay-per-result model.

The pricing is flat β€” $1.00 per 1,000 businesses, across all plans.

  1. All plans: $1.00 per 1,000 results
Apify Yelp scraper pricing page showing flat $1.00 per 1,000 results across all plans

There is a free plan that comes with $5/month in platform credits.

One thing worth noting: the cost doesn't drop as you scale.

Whether you scrape 1,000 results or 100,000 results, the per-result rate stays the same.

So Apify rewards no one for volume.

Scalability

Apify can handle large inputs β€” but scaling runs into two walls fast.

On the input side, there's no CSV upload.

You add Yelp URLs via Bulk edit, which works, but if your list lives in a spreadsheet, you're copying and pasting manually.
Bulk edit image

Fine for small batches, not for repeatable large-volume work.

On the output side, there's no concurrency dial.

You can queue more URLs, but you can't control how aggressively the scraper processes them.

Scaling is linear β€” a bigger job just means a longer wait, with no lever to compress it.

Then there's the reliability problem.

In my test, 23 out of 62 requests failed β€” a 37% failure rate on a small run. At scale, that compounds fast.

Apify scraper results showing 23 out of 62 requests failed β€” a 37% failure rate

The Issues tab tells the same story: users report zero output, proxy failures, the scraper not returning anything at all.

These aren't edge cases β€” they follow a consistent pattern of Yelp blocking the actor with no clear feedback to the user.

Apify Issues tab showing user-reported zero output, proxy failures, and the Yelp scraper not working

At 2,667 minutes per 1,000 results, the monthly ceiling is roughly 5,400 results/month β€” and that assumes every request succeeds.

Apify is unstable at scale.

No throughput control and a 37% request failure rate mean you cannot count on consistent results.

A larger job just compounds the data loss with no lever to fix either problem.

Ease of use

Getting started looks straightforward. You enter a search term, set a location, and hit run.

The interface accepts either search terms or direct Yelp URLs from the same screen.

Result limiting is available so you can cap results before running.

GIF showing Apify Yelp scraper setup interface with search term and URL input options

There's no deduplication or "unique results" control. If your inputs overlap, you'll be cleaning duplicates after export.

There's also an image scraping tab β€” you set how many images to pull per business profile.

Practical if you need visual data, unnecessary overhead if you don't.

Apify Yelp scraper image scraping toggle showing how many images to pull per business profile

Scheduling is available. Recurring scrapes can be set up without extra tools.

Apify scheduling interface showing recurring scrape configuration options

Export options are strong: CSV, JSON, Excel, and direct integrations with Make, Zapier, and n8n.

Apify export options showing CSV, JSON, Excel and integration connections

Speed

Apify was inconsistent. Two runs returned zero results. The third returned 3 results in 8 minutes.

Apify speed test showing two zero-result runs and one run returning 3 results in 8 minutes

With a 37% request failure rate and 2,667 minutes for 1,000 results, this is just not usable.

Customer support

Apify provides support through live chat, a ticketing system, and a Discord community.

Live chat is solid for general questions. For technical troubleshooting, the issue system is the better route.

That said, response time for this actor was extremely slowβ€”15 days. That's not a backlog; that's a different calendar.

For a tool with documented zero-result failures, a 15-day support window means you're on your own when a run breaks.

Apify support ticket showing a 15-day response time for the Yelp scraper actor

Best for

Pick this when you want to see what Yelp data looks like before spending anything.

The $5 free credit is real, and for a quick sample to check if the field coverage fits your use case, it's enough.

Don't treat it as a production tool. The reliability record is too inconsistent for anything you need to count on.


Bright Data

Bright Data is an enterprise data collection platform with a dedicated no-code Yelp scraper offering β€” five separate scrapers covering business overviews, reviews, and search-based discovery.
Bright Data homepage showing the Yelp scraper product page
Pros Cons
Rich business data coverage No scheduling
Only tool that returns video URLs 1 in 3 records missing
Multiple export and delivery options No deduplication
Pay-as-you-go option available No concurrency control
CSV import

Key features

  1. 29 data fields per listing
  2. images_videos_urls β€” captures photos and video links in a single field
  3. Bulk URL upload via CSV
  4. Export to CSV, JSON, NDJSON, or Parquet
  5. Cloud delivery to Amazon S3, Google Cloud, Azure, Snowflake, or SFTP
  6. Cloud-based, no installation needed

Data

Bright Data returns 29 fields per listing.

Here are all 29 fields:

πŸ†” business_id πŸ†” yelpbizid πŸ“„ name πŸ“ updatesfrombusiness
⭐ overall_rating ⭐ reviews_count πŸ“Š is_claimed 🏷️ categories
πŸ”— website πŸ“ž phone_number πŸ“… opening_hours πŸ“ address
πŸ“ address:zip_code πŸ“ full_address 🏷️ amenities πŸ“ aboutthebusiness
🏷️ highlights πŸ“‹ services_offered πŸ”— url πŸ’° price_range
πŸ“Œ latitude πŸ“Œ longitude 🌐 service_area πŸ™οΈ city
🌐 state 🌐 country πŸ“ zip_code πŸ–ΌοΈ imagesvideosurls
πŸ“Š is_closed

The address coverage is the most granular of any tool. Bright Data splits location into address, fulladdress, address:zipcode, city, state, country, and zip_code β€” seven separate location fields.

images_videos_urls combines photo and video links in a single field. It's the only tool on this list that returns video URLs.

Bright Data has four fields no other tool returns:

| πŸ“ updatesfrombusiness | 🏷️ highlights | πŸ“‹ services_offered | 🌐 service_area |

highlights returns short tags the business uses to describe itself. services_offered lists the specific services flagged on the Yelp profile.
updates_from_business captures posts or announcements the business has published β€” useful for tracking activity or freshness.

service_area returns the geographic area the business covers, not just where it's located. Relevant for mobile or delivery-based businesses.

Affordability

Bright Data gives you two ways to pay.

No monthly commitment, or a subscription that gets cheaper as you scale.

Pay as you go:

  1. $1.50 per 1,000 results

Monthly subscription:

  1. 380K plan: $1.30 per 1,000 results
  2. 900K plan: $1.10 per 1,000 results
  3. 2M plan: $1.00 per 1,000 results
Bright Data Yelp scraper pricing page showing pay-as-you-go and monthly subscription options

The pay-as-you-go option is the most flexible. No commitment, no monthly fee β€” you only pay for what you use.

There is no free tier. But a 7-day trial is available to test before committing.

Scalability

Bright Data supports CSV upload for bulk inputs, so large input lists are easy to load.

On the output side, there's no concurrency control inside the scraper setup.

Scaling depends on the platform's execution layer rather than a setting you can tune yourself.

More inputs means a longer wait, with no lever to push throughput.

Then there's the reliability problem.

I requested 30 records using the Discover by search filters template and got 20 back.

That's a 66.67% success rate β€” roughly 1 in 3 records simply doesn't come back.

Bright Data results showing 20 records returned out of 30 requested β€” 1 in 3 missing

At scale, that's not a rounding error. That's missing data.

At 94 minutes per 1,000 results, the theoretical monthly ceiling is 153K results/month.

At a 66.7% success rate, the usable ceiling is closer to 102K results/month.

Bright Data is unstable at scale.

No concurrency control and a 33% record failure rate mean output volume and completeness are both unpredictable.

You have no control over either.

Ease of use

Bright Data offers five different Yelp scrapers. Two are for reviews (so let's ignore them).

The other three are where things start to blur β€” two of them, Discover by URL and Collect by URL, are basically twins.
the 5 yelp scrapers
Discover by URL looks like the sensible place to start.
The interface is clean β€” paste a URL, upload a CSV for bulk inputs, and hit Start collecting.
Bright data user Interface

Result limiting is available so you can cap results before running, but there's no deduplication control, so overlapping inputs can produce repeats.

The bigger issue wasn't duplicates though. It returned zero results. Repeated runs, same outcome.

zero result
Collect by URL was no different. Two out of three business scrapers, nothing came back.

Discover by search filters is the one that actually works.

Three fields β€” country, category, and location β€” one row, done.

Bright Data Discover by search filters interface showing country, category, and location input fields

Simple enough, but if your workflow is URL-first, it's not a natural fit.

You're forced into their filters instead of feeding it the exact pages you already know you want.

Scheduling isn't available on the no-code platform either. If you need recurring scrapes, you'll be re-triggering runs manually every time.

Exports and integrations are the bright spot. JSON, NDJSON, CSV, or Parquet β€” delivered straight to Amazon S3, Snowflake, Google Cloud, Azure, or SFTP.

Bright Data export and delivery options showing S3, Snowflake, Google Cloud, Azure, and SFTP integrations

Speed

The numbers here depend on which scraper you're using β€” and that matters.

Discover by URL returned 0 result twice.

So let's drop that for now.

speed result with Discover by URL
Discover by search filters tells a more useful story. 30 results in 169 seconds β€” roughly 94 minutes for 1,000 results.

But the success rate was 66.67%. That means 1 in 3 requested records didn't come back.

speed result with Discover by search filters

Fast on paper. Less so when you factor in the missing data.

Customer support

Customer support is available through a live chat widget on the platform.

If you notice missing data, there's also a Request missing data option.

It works, but the process is slow β€” you fill out a form, then wait for a follow-up over email.

Bright Data Request missing data form for reporting incomplete records and requesting follow-up over email

Best for

Pick this when Yelp is one of several sources feeding into a larger system β€” and the destination matters more than the scraper.

S3, Snowflake, Google Cloud, Azure: if your pipeline already lives there, Bright Data fits in without friction.

If Yelp is your only source, or you're working URL-first, the setup overhead and incomplete output make it hard to justify.


ScrapeHero Cloud

ScrapeHero Cloud is a managed web scraping service with prebuilt scrapers for major platforms β€” including a Yelp Business Details Scraper.
ScrapeHero Cloud homepage showing the Yelp Business Details Scraper page
Pros Cons
Unique rating_histogram Expensive at scale
Data Credit Calculator before each run No live chat
No deduplication
No CSV import
No concurrency control

Key features

  1. 23 data fields per listing
  2. rating_histogram β€” full 1-through-5-star review breakdown per business
  3. Data Credit Calculator shows exact cost before each run
  4. Schedule recurring scrapes
  5. Export to CSV, JSON, and Excel
  6. Cloud delivery to Google Drive, Dropbox, and Amazon S3 β€” REST API also available
  7. Cloud-based, no installation needed

Data

ScrapeHero Cloud returns 23 fields per listing.

Here are all 23 fields:

πŸ“„ business_name πŸ“ address πŸ“ž phone ⭐ average_rating
⭐ total_reviews πŸ”— url πŸ”— website πŸ“Œ geo_coordinates
πŸ“ street πŸ™οΈ locality 🌐 country 🌐 state
πŸ“ zipcode πŸ“Š rating_histogram πŸ“ fromthebusiness πŸ‘€ owner
πŸ–ΌοΈ owner_photo πŸ“… year_joined πŸ“Š claimed 🏷️ amenities
πŸ“… workhours πŸ’° price_range 🏷️ category

ScrapeHero Cloud has a few exclusive fields. Here are those fields:

| πŸ“Š rating_histogram | πŸ‘€ owner | πŸ–ΌοΈ owner_photo | πŸ“… year_joined |

rating_histogram lets you go beyond averages. Instead of a single average score, it returns the full star breakdown β€” how many 1-star, 2-star, 3-star, 4-star, and 5-star reviews the business has.
It also returns owner and owner_photo β€” the name and profile photo of the Yelp business owner, not a reviewer.

year_joined tells you how long the business has been on Yelp.

Affordability

ScrapeHero Cloud runs on a credit-based subscription model. Every 10 credits = 1 record.

  1. Free plan: 40 records
  2. Lite plan: $8.33 per 1,000 results
  3. Ultra plan: $2.50 per 1,000 results
GIF showing ScrapeHero Cloud pricing plans and credit-based cost breakdown

The free plan is genuinely limited β€” 40 records is barely enough to test the tool.

The cost drops as you scale, but even at Ultra it's more expensive than Apify's flat $1.00 per 1,000 results.

Scalability

ScrapeHero can take a large input without flinching.

There's no CSV import, but you can paste URLs in bulk directly.

I tested that by dropping in 1M+ links β€” the interface didn't complain or cap it.

ScrapeHero Cloud URL input field showing 1M+ links pasted without hitting a cap

That's a UI capability, not an execution one. At 308 minutes per 1,000 results with no concurrency, processing 1M URLs would take over 20 months.

There's no concurrency or parallel run setting, so you can't control how aggressively the scraper works through the list.

The monthly ceiling is roughly 47K results/month β€” scaling up means waiting longer, not running faster.

ScrapeHero is moderately stable.

Output is consistent and costs are credit-based, but there is no concurrency control β€” throughput is fixed, so large jobs scale only by waiting longer.

Ease of use

The setup is project-based β€” name your project, paste your URLs, and hit "Gather Data."

It accepts both business URLs and search URLs in the same input field.

You can set a results cap before the run starts, so you're not pulling more than you need.

ScrapeHero Cloud project setup interface showing URL input field and Gather Data button

There's no deduplication or "unique results" toggle.

If your URL list overlaps, you'll see repeats and have to clean them after export.

The right side panel has a Help section worth mentioning.

It has a Data Credit Calculator that shows exactly how many credits a run will cost before you start β€” no surprises after the fact.

There's also a setup guide that walks you through each field. Both are handy if it's your first time.

ScrapeHero Cloud right panel showing the Data Credit Calculator and setup guide

Scheduling is available, but it lives outside the main setup flow β€” you configure it after the run, not before.

You can adjust frequency, start date, timezone, and an optional end date.

GIF showing ScrapeHero Cloud scheduling interface with frequency, start date, and timezone options

Export is straightforward: CSV, JSON, and Excel directly from the results page.

Integration options are also multiple β€” Google Drive, Dropbox, and Amazon S3 for storage, plus a REST API for automation.

GIF showing ScrapeHero Cloud integrations with Google Drive, Dropbox, and Amazon S3

Speed

ScrapeHero collected 10 records in 3 minutes 5 seconds.

That's roughly 308 minutes for 1,000 results.

Clean run, no failures.

ScrapeHero Cloud speed test showing 10 results collected in 3 minutes 5 seconds

Customer support

There's no live chat support here.

Instead, you get a help center that funnels you into FAQs and "common issues" articles.

ScrapeHero Cloud help center showing FAQ articles and common issues documentation

In practice, you're expected to dig through documentation first.

If you still can't find what you need, you can submit a support ticket.

ScrapeHero Cloud support ticket submission form

It works, but it's a bit tedious.

Best for

Pick this when the field list is the reason β€” specifically rating_histogram, owner, or year_joined, which no other tool here returns.

If those fields drive the work, ScrapeHero gives you something the others can't.

If those fields aren't in your brief, the cost and speed don't justify it.


WebScraper.io

WebScraper.io is a cloud scraping platform built around prebuilt sitemap templates β€” including dedicated Yelp scrapers.
WebScraper.io homepage showing the Yelp scraper template page
Pros Cons
Concurrency via Parallel tasks Most expensive
Multiple export formats No deduplication
Rich cloud delivery

Key features

  1. 10 data fields per listing
  2. Bulk Start URL Import via Text or CSV (up to 20,000 URLs)
  3. Concurrency via Parallel tasks
  4. Schedule recurring scrapes
  5. Export to CSV, JSON, and XLSX
  6. Cloud delivery to Dropbox, Google Sheets, Google Drive, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3, and Azure
  7. Cloud-based, no installation needed

Data

WebScraper.io returns 10 fields per listing.

Here are all 10 fields:

πŸ”— business_url πŸ“„ business_name 🏷️ categories ⭐ rating
⭐ review_count πŸ“ address πŸ“ž phone_number πŸ”— website_url
πŸ–ΌοΈ images πŸ“… opening_hours

Nothing here is exclusiveβ€”every field shows up in at least one of the other tools.

The set is practical. It's enough to build a basic contact list or run a quick market scan.

What you don't get: price tier, claimed/verified status, open/closed status, coordinates, amenities, or email.

So it works for "who's here," not "who's worth prioritizing."

Affordability

WebScraper.io runs on a monthly subscription model with a free 7-day trial, so you can test it before committing.

The pricing model is worth understanding before you run anything.

It's based on URL credits, where 1 credit = 1 page loaded by the cloud scraper β€” not 1 result.

WebScraper.io pricing page showing Project, Professional, and Scale plan options

That makes costs harder to predict upfront than a flat per-result rate.

In my Yelp run, it loaded 20 pages and returned 18 records β€” roughly 1.1 pages per result.

ratio image

So 1,000 results took roughly 1,100 URL credits in this setup. Based on the plan limits, that works out to approximately:

  1. Project: $11 per 1,000 results
  2. Professional: $5.50 per 1,000 results

In practice, you'll pay more than you expect if you assume pages = results.

Scalability

WebScraper.io handles bulk input cleanly.

You can upload start URLs via Text or CSV file β€” up to 20,000 URLs.

Choose to either Replace or Append to an existing list.

WebScraper.io bulk URL import interface

The Append option is useful for recurring scrapes that build on a previous input rather than starting from scratch.

On the output side, WebScraper.io supports concurrency via Parallel tasks, so you can control how many scraping jobs run at the same time.

showing concurrency via parallel tasks

At 182 minutes per 1,000 results, the baseline monthly ceiling is roughly 79K results/month β€” and that scales up as you add more parallel tasks.

WebScraper.io is stable at scale. Parallel tasks give throughput control, output is consistent, and the Replace/Append option keeps recurring input manageable.

Ease of use

WebScraper.io is URL-first workflow.

Paste a URL and WebScraper.io immediately matches it to a scraper.

Two template options appear β€” business listings and business pages.

The right one is pre-selected based on your URL.

WebScraper.io showing two template options β€” business listings and business pages β€” with the correct one pre-selected

That part is genuinely useful.

But there's no confirmation step β€” clicking "Import & Run" fires the scrape immediately with no settings, no limit, nothing to configure.

For first-time users, that's disorienting. You lose control before you even find it.

There's no deduplication or 'unique results' setting either, so duplicate cleanup happens after export.

Scheduling exists but lives in a separate tab β€” not immediately obvious how to find it.

GIF showing WebScraper.io scheduling tab and recurring scrape setup options

Export is simple and direct β€” CSV, JSON, and XLSX available straight from the jobs table with one click.

WebScraper.io jobs table showing one-click CSV, JSON, and XLSX export buttons

Data delivery options are broad β€” Dropbox, Google Sheets, Google Drive, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3, and Azure Blob Storage are all supported.

GIF showing WebScraper.io cloud delivery options including Dropbox, Google Sheets, S3, and Azure

Speed

WebScraper.io returned 18 records in 3 minutes 17 seconds.

That's roughly 182 minutes for 1,000 results β€” reliable for small runs.

WebScraper.io speed test showing 18 results collected in 3 minutes 17 seconds

Customer support

Customer support is available through a live chat, and email.

There is an AI assistant on the platform.

GIF showing the WebScraper.io AI assistant chat interface on the platform

Email support claims a response within a few hours.

I didn't manage to break anything badly enough to test that, so I'll take their word for it.

Best for

Pick this when the job is small and the priority is getting started quickly.

Paste a URL, the template is pre-selected, you're running in minutes β€” no decisions to make upfront.

The cost per 1,000 is the highest on this list. That's fine for occasional spot checks. It's a problem if the list is long.


FAQ

Can I scrape email addresses from Yelp business listings?

Yelp doesn't surface business emails on its pages.

The only tool here that returns emails is lobstr.io β€” it visits each business's own website to find a contact address.

Can I resume a Yelp scrape without re-pulling records I've already collected?

Not natively, across any of the five tools.

lobstr.io's deduplication toggle removes duplicates within a single run β€” it doesn't track what was collected in previous runs.

Which is the cheapest tool for scraping Yelp at scale?

Apify is the cheapest at a flat $1.00 per 1,000 results with a free tier β€” but the reliability problems make it risky at scale.

lobstr.io's Team plan comes out to $0.50 per 1,000 results without contact collection β€” the lowest cost for reliable output.

Which Yelp scraper is the most reliable?

lobstr.io is the most reliable tool on this list. It returned consistent results across every test run, with no zero-result failures.

It has built-in deduplication and returns 30 fields β€” the most complete data of any tool here, including emails.

At scale, it also comes out the cheapest β€” $0.50 per 1,000 results on the Team plan without contact collection.

Conclusion

That's a wrap. If you've found something better for Yelp scraping, feel free to ping me on LinkedIn.

Related Articles

Related Squids