# I Tested and Compared the Best Email Finder APIs of 2025

> We tested dozens of email finder APIs and selected the top 9 for you. Here is a complete comparison based on accuracy, speed, and affordability.

- **Author**: Shehriar Awan
- **Published**: 2025-04-07, updated 2025-04-04 (4 Apr 2025)
- **Reading time**: 20 min
- **Canonical**: https://www.lobstr.io/blog/email-finder-api

---

I was looking for a **solid email finder API**—something affordable, scalable, and actually built for devs.

So I turned to Google.

And, surprise surprise… it threw a million options at me.

![serp - image17.gif](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/serp_image17_ebdce3b4ae.gif "width=1389;height=832")

[Collect all Google Search Results data from any location in seconds](https://www.lobstr.io/store/google-search-scraper)

But most of the listicles I found felt more like ads. **No real pros and cons, no honest takes**.

Also most of them were no-code SaaS platforms that happen to offer an API.

So I did my own digging—tested a lot of APIs from Google results, Reddit threads, and dev communities.

This article sums up what I found: the good, the bad, and **which email finder APIs are actually worth using**.

| **API**                                 | **Overall Rating** | **Cost/1k emails** | **Speed/1k requests (minutes)** | **Emails found/1k leads** | **Best for**                                                                       | **Drawbacks**                       |
| --------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
| [Findymail](#1-findymail)               | 4.7                | $49                | 4                               | 492                       | SMEs looking for scalable email finder API with easy email sequencer integrations  |                                     |
| [Anymail finder](#2-anymail-finder)     | 4.8                | $49                | 155                             | 476                       | SMEs looking for scalable but affordable email enrichment API                      | Too slow                            |
| [Apollo](#3-apollo)                     | 4.5                | $11.8              | 8                               | 430                       | Medium-sized businesses and enterprises looking for programmatic sales prospecting | Outdated data                       |
| [Hunter](#4-hunter)                     | 4.2                | $50                | 30                              | 281                       | Medium sized businesses looking for scalable prospecting and email enrichment API  | Less emails, expensive verification |
| [Skrapp](#5-skrapp)                     | 3.9                | $49                | 20                              | 373                       | LinkedIn email collection                                                          | Less accurate                       |
| [Snov](#6-snov)                         | 3.6                | $39                | 18                              | 180                       | LinkedIn email collection and multi-channel outreach                               | Rate limit and less emails          |
| [People Data Labs](#7-people-data-labs) | 3.3                | $280               | 21                              | 450                       | Scalable email enrichment                                                          | Very expensive                      |
| [Icypeas](#8-icypeas)                   | 3.0                | $16.5              | 22                              | 265                       | Most affordable email collection                                                   | Questionable accuracy               |
| [Dropcontact](#9-dropcontact)           | 2.7                | $65                | 149                             | 383                       | Scalable email enrichment                                                          | Expensive and very slow             |

But what was my testing criteria?

## How to choose the best email finder API?

Here's the thing—most articles I found online were just fluff.

They threw around fancy buzzwords and repeated the same stuff you'd see on each tool's own website. **Not helpful when you actually need to build something**.

![competitor roast - image40.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/competitor_roast_image40_1706f8c3ba.png "width=973;height=823")

So I hit up Reddit, dev forums, and other nerdy corners of the internet to find **what really matters when picking an email finder API**.
Based on all that, I came up with a **6 factors checklist to evaluate each email finder API**:

![api criteria - image5.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/api_criteria_image5_983fcbfc60.png "width=662;height=532")

1. **Accuracy** – Does it return valid and verified emails?
2. **Quantity** – How many leads came back with enriched emails?
3. **Affordability** – Is it reasonably priced, or do I need VC funding just to test it?
4. **Speed** – How fast do the results show up?
5. **Scalability** – Can it handle bulk enrichment or large workflows?
6. **Accessibility** – How easy is it to integrate the API into my workflow?

| API                  | Accuracy | Quantity | Affordability | Scalability | Speed | Accessibility | Overall Rating |
| -------------------- | :------: | :------: | :-----------: | :---------: | :---: | :-----------: | :------------: |
| **Findymail**        |  ★★★★★   |  ★★★★★   |     ★★★★      |    ★★★★     | ★★★★★ |     ★★★★      |    **4.9**     |
| **Anymail finder**   |  ★★★★★   |  ★★★★★   |     ★★★★      |    ★★★★★    |  ★★   |     ★★★★      |    **4.7**     |
| **Apollo**           |   ★★★★   |   ★★★★   |     ★★★★★     |    ★★★★     | ★★★★★ |     ★★★★      |    **4.5**     |
| **Hunter**           |   ★★★★   |   ★★★    |     ★★★★      |    ★★★★     | ★★★★  |     ★★★★      |    **4.2**     |
| **Skrapp**           |   ★★★    |   ★★★★   |     ★★★★      |     ★★★     | ★★★★★ |      ★★★      |    **3.9**     |
| **Snov**             |   ★★★★   |    ★★    |     ★★★★★     |     ★★★     | ★★★★★ |     ★★★★★     |    **3.6**     |
| **People Data Labs** |   ★★★★   |   ★★★★   |      ★★       |    ★★★★★    | ★★★★★ |     ★★★★      |    **3.3**     |
| **Icypeas**          |   ★★★    |   ★★★    |     ★★★★★     |     ★★★     | ★★★★★ |      ★★★      |    **3.0**     |
| **Dropcontact**      |   ★★★★   |   ★★★★   |      ★★★      |    ★★★★★    |  ★★   |      ★★★      |    **2.7**     |

> I have rated each API based on factors listed above, so my overall rating might be different from user rating.

I used a list of 1000 random leads and tested each tool on the same dataset.

**To get accuracy right**, I compared each tool's valid emails, bounce rates, and user reviews. I also checked the bounce rate guarantees and refund options.

**To verify the quantity**, I checked how many emails were collected against those 1000 leads.

**To check affordability**, I calculated the total cost of 1000 emails.

**To confirm speed**, I made sure my script notes down the total API response time of 1000 requests and response time per request.

**For scalability**, I checked rate limits, max number of credits/requests per month, and options like pay-as-you-go and enterprise plans.

**For accessibility checking**, I considered factors like how well-structured the documentation is, is the API sync or async, and overall how easy it is to integrate in other workflows.

Based on these factors, here are the __top 9 email finder APIs__.

## Best email finder APIs of 2025

| **API**                                 | **Overall Rating** | **Cost/1k emails** | **Speed/1k requests (minutes)** | **Emails found/1k leads** | **Best for**                                                                       | **Drawbacks**                       |
| --------------------------------------- | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
| [Findymail](#1-findymail)               | 4.7                | $49                | 4                               | 492                       | SMEs looking for scalable email finder API with easy email sequencer integrations  |                                     |
| [Anymail finder](#2-anymail-finder)     | 4.8                | $49                | 155                             | 476                       | SMEs looking for scalable but affordable email enrichment API                      | Too slow                            |
| [Apollo](#3-apollo)                     | 4.5                | $11.8              | 8                               | 430                       | Medium-sized businesses and enterprises looking for programmatic sales prospecting | Outdated data                       |
| [Hunter](#4-hunter)                     | 4.2                | $50                | 30                              | 281                       | Medium sized businesses looking for scalable prospecting and email enrichment API  | Less emails, expensive verification |
| [Skrapp](#5-skrapp)                     | 3.9                | $49                | 20                              | 373                       | LinkedIn email collection                                                          | Less accurate                       |
| [Snov](#6-snov)                         | 3.6                | $39                | 18                              | 180                       | LinkedIn email collection and multi-channel outreach                               | Rate limit and less emails          |
| [People Data Labs](#7-people-data-labs) | 3.3                | $280               | 21                              | 450                       | Scalable email enrichment                                                          | Very expensive                      |
| [Icypeas](#8-icypeas)                   | 3.0                | $16.5              | 22                              | 265                       | Most affordable email collection                                                   | Questionable accuracy               |
| [Dropcontact](#9-dropcontact)           | 2.7                | $65                | 149                             | 383                       | Scalable email enrichment                                                          | Expensive and very slow             |


### 1. Findymail

__Overall rating: 4.9__
**Rating: 4.9 (G2, 54 reviews)**

Findymail is a French B2B email and phone data enrichment company. It offers a good no-code app plus a **really well-documented email finder API**.

![findymail - image4.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/findymail_image4_994bc610bd.png "width=1594;height=907")

#### Features

* Email finder and email verifier
* CRM data enrichment and cleaning
* Multiple 3rd party integrations offered
* Email finder Chrome extension
* Apollo and Sales Navigator leads export

Starting with accuracy, **Findymail claims less than 5% bounce rate**. The claim is backed by the quality of emails they provide and user reviews also praise their accuracy.

![findymail review - image32.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/findymail_review_image32_278d0d1192.png "width=1254;height=381")

Unlike other email validation tools, **it doesn't give you risky or invalid catch-all emails**. You only get safe and verified emails.

Along with data quality, the data quantity is also amazing. I was able to **collect 492 emails from my 1000 leads dataset**.

Also Findymail is also pretty fast (actually the fastest in the list). **The response time was 4 minutes**.

**The documentation is simple and clean**. Though it's not as well documented as Anymail finder. Findymail's API is synchronous and pretty easy to integrate.

![findymail docs - image10.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/findymail_docs_image10_0d78fa3de9.png "width=1883;height=907")

But there's no bulk enrichment or batch processing support.

You can directly export all collected emails to CRMs, [cold emailing tools](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/best-cold-email-software) like Lemlist and Instantly, or to [workflow automation tools](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/workflow-automation-tools) like Zapier and Make.

#### Pricing and scalability

![findymail pricing - image15.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/findymail_pricing_image15_8a01a0e956.png "width=1832;height=909")

* Costs **$49 per 1000 verified emails**
* At scale, the cost goes down to $8.4 per 1000 emails (100k emails)

**Duplicate searches are free**. It doesn't show risky emails so you don't pay for them either. You can get a custom quotation for higher volumes.

There's a rate limit of 300 concurrent requests. **No daily or hourly rate limits**.

For email list cleaning (emails collected from other sources), **it costs $49 per 1000 verifications**.

| **Pros**                            | **Cons**                                |
| ----------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- |
| Accurate                            | Won't display partially verified emails |
| Clean documentation                 |                                         |
| Good email enrichment rate          |                                         |
| Integrates with cold emailing tools |                                         |
| CRM enrichment                      |                                         |

#### Best for

Findymail is a great solution if you're looking for an **affordable email finder API to integrate with your cold outreach workflow**.

Though it offers a no-code dashboard, it's basically an API-focused service and can be used as an Anymail finder alternative.

### 2. Anymail finder

__Overall rating: 4.8__
**User Rating: 4.4 (Capterra, 26 reviews)**

Anymail finder is a UK-based email email finder service that offers email enrichment and email validation services. **It offers a developer-friendly email finder API too**.

![anymailfinder - image22.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/anymailfinder_image22_c392917aa1.png "width=1508;height=747")

#### Features

* Search emails by name, domain/company name, and job role
* Real-time email verification
* Offers a Chrome extension for quick email lookups
* Offers LinkedIn email finder
* Zapier and Make integrations built-in

**Anymail finder claims 97% accuracy**, which means as per their claim you'll see only 3% bounce rate on their verified emails.

![anymail finder accuracy - image24.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/anymail_finder_accuracy_image24_b8aa3e80b1.png "width=982;height=771")

The platform performs a variety of deliverability checks including spam trap detection and catch-all checks.

The best thing is, they don't hold back any data. You get both fully verified and partially verified (risky, catch-all) emails but **only pay for the fully verified ones**.

![anymail finder review - image7.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/anymail_finder_review_image7_416fdccc5c.png "width=887;height=364")

As for enrichment, it did a decent job. Out of the **1,000 leads I tested, it returned 476 emails**.

**The downside? Speed**. It took around 155 minutes (a little over 2.5 hours) to process the dataset—one of the slowest in my testing.

That said, **the API is super dev-friendly**. For single lookups, it's synchronous—you send a request and get the result instantly.

![anymailfinder docs - image1.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/anymailfinder_docs_image1_136aa64a52.png "width=1301;height=905")

**But for bulk lookups, it works asynchronously**. That means you first upload your data, and then make another request later to fetch the results once the processing is done.

A bit of extra handling, but that's standard for most bulk endpoints.

#### Pricing and scalability

![anymail finder pricing - image30.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/anymail_finder_pricing_image30_4fdf2e6ca7.png "width=1525;height=692")

* **Cost me $49 for 1000 emails**
* At scale, it costs $10 per 1000 emails (up to 50k emails per month)

The best thing about Anymail finder is that it **only charges for verified emails**. Risky emails and duplicate searches are free.

**There are no rate limits on API**. Plus you can get a custom quote for higher volumes.

If you have an email list to clean, Anymail finder's **email verifier API costs $9.8 per 1000 email verifications**.

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Affordable | Very slow |
| Scalable | |
| Well-structured documentation | |
| Good enrichment rate | |
| Easy to integrate | |

#### Best for

**If you're looking for a scalable and affordable email finder solution** to integrate to your workflows or automation apps, Anymail finder is a great choice.

It's an API-focused service, made for developers and the pricing plans are **suitable for small and medium sized businesses**.

### 3. Apollo

__Overall rating: 4.5__
**Rating: 4.9 (G2, 8,482 reviews)**

Apollo is a B2B sales platform that offers a variety of sales solutions like GTM, prospecting, data enrichment, and much more.

![apollo - image14.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/apollo_image14_dcb4c9c17c.png "width=1875;height=820")

#### Features

* B2B data enrichment
* Waterfall enrichment
* Huge leads database
* GTM workflow automation
* Chrome extension and lots of integrations

**Apollo is not as accurate** as the top 2 APIs in my list. The platform claims 91% email accuracy.

Plus I did find some users complaining about outdated data.

![apollo review - image23.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/apollo_review_image23_59a68be5c8.png "width=1139;height=241")

But in terms of quantity, Apollo is pretty impressive. It got me **430 emails out of my 1000 leads dataset**.

Apollo is the fastest email finder of my list. **I was able to process all 1000 leads in just 8 minutes**.

Just like speed, it excels in API documentation too. **Apollo's enrichment API is really well-documented and detailed**.

![apollo docs - image3.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/apollo_docs_image3_582135b95f.png "width=1832;height=881")

It offers a bulk enrichment route too which allows you to enrich up to 10 leads per request. **Both single and bulk API routes are synchronous**.

#### Pricing and scalability

![apollo pricing - image12.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/apollo_pricing_image12_3b09b81604.png "width=1739;height=825")

* Starts at **$11.8 per 1000 emails**
* At scale, price goes down to $9.9 per 1000 emails

But it's not scalable due to rate limits. There's a **rate cap of 4000 requests per day**, which makes it unscalable.

![apollo rate limit - image34.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/apollo_rate_limit_image34_df504593f8.png "width=1686;height=372")

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Affordable | Bad API rate limit |
| Fast | Less accurate |
| Complete data enrichment | |
| Huge leads database | |
| Waterfall enrichment | |

#### Best for

If you're looking for an **all-in-one data enrichment API** backed by a big leads database, Apollo is a good choice.

It gives you all the data you need for sales prospecting. You get 30+ data points including verified emails (personal and work) and phone numbers.

**But due to its rate cap, you'll struggle scaling your workflow with its API**.

### 4. Hunter

__Overall rating: 4.2__
**Rating: 4.6 (Capterra, 683 reviews)**

Hunter.io is an all-in-one email outreach platform for prospecting, email enrichment and cold emailing. It offers a really popular email finder API.

![hunter - image8.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/hunter_image8_351a2f4b42.png "width=1836;height=840")

#### Features

* Prospect discovery with intent signals
* Find finder and verifier
* Cold email sending tool
* Multiple 3rd-party Integrations
* Browser extensions and Google Sheets Addon

**Hunter claims 95% deliverability** and most of the user reviews also say it's quite accurate. 

![hunter review - image27.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/hunter_review_image27_d10c61ff2d.png "width=911;height=589")

Plus it shows a confidence score in verification status to highlight the likeliness of an email landing your prospect's inbox.

But the enrichment rate was not impressive in my testing. **It gave me only 281 valid emails**.

Hunter is quite better in terms of speed compared to my top 2 contendars. It processed all the leads in **less than 30 minutes**.

What's really impressive is **Hunter's API documentation**. It's clean, simple, and well-structured.

![hunter docs - image2.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/hunter_docs_image2_1515846644.png "width=1885;height=866")

The API is synchronous and **there's no bulk processing route**.

#### Pricing and scalability

![hunter pricing - image29.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/hunter_pricing_image29_736e1211b4.png "width=1391;height=683")

* Costs **$50 per 1000 emails**
* At scale, the prices goes down to $6.9 per 1000 emails

Hunter's emails are verified in real-time without extra cost. If you want to clean your own email list, it'll cost you **$11 per 1000 verifications**.

Though Hunter offers up to 1M search credits, it comes with an API** rate limit of 500 requests per minute**.

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Accurate | Bad rate limit |
| Fast | Low enrichment percentage |
| Affordable at scale | Expensive email verification |
| Prospecting and emailing tools | |
| Well-structured API | |

#### Best for

**Hunter's API is pretty scalable** and offers both prospecting and enrichment routes. You can consider it for cold emailing automation.

What makes it #4 is its bad enrichment percentage and rate limits. Plus the fact that it's not suitable for small  businesses due to expensive entry level pricing.

### 5. Skrapp

__Overall rating: 3.9__
**Rating: 4.1 (G2, 139 reviews)**

Skrapp.io is a Singapore based B2B lead generation company. It offers a LinkedIn-focused prospecting and email enrichment API.

![skrapp - image13.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/skrapp_image13_8156eed95d.png "width=1579;height=877")

#### Features

* Email finder and verifier
* Find emails from both LinkedIn and Sales Navigator
* Own leads database
* CRM integrations

Starting with accuracy, **Skrapp claims 92% accuracy** but I found this claim a bit exaggerated because I found multiple user reviews complaining about accuracy.

![skrapp review - image21.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/skrapp_review_image21_4dd521b5f6.png "width=1733;height=477")

Email enrichment percentage was better than Hunter in my tests. It collected **373 verified email addresses** from my Sheet.

In terms of speed, it outperformed Hunter. The response time for **processing 1000 rows was around 20 minutes**.

**The API documentation is too simplified**. Won't tell you much about the technicalities. You'll have to check JSON responses to understand it properly.

![skrapp docs - image9.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/skrapp_docs_image9_b619a75c40.png "width=1216;height=810")

**It offers both single and bulk email finder API endpoints, synchronously**. You can add up to 100 rows per API call.

#### Pricing and scalability

![skrapp pricing - image35.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/skrapp_pricing_image35_daa2af5987.png "width=1493;height=743")

* Costs **$49 per 1000 email searches**
* At scale, the pricing can go down to $7 per 1000 emails.

Email list cleaning will cost you $49 per 1000 verifications. Duplicate searches and verifications are free.

**I didn't find any rate limits, that's why I'm not sure about scalability**.

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Fast | Less accurate |
| Scalable | Vague API documentation |
| LinkedIn email collection without Sales Navigator | Low enrichment percentage |
| Affordable | |
| CRM integrations | |

#### Best for

**It can be used as an alternative to Hunter**, since it's faster and offers more emails than Hunter. Pricing plans are suitable for SMBs.

The reason I ranked it below Hunter is its accuracy and uncertainty about API rate limits.

### 6. Snov

__Overall rating: 3.6__
**Rating: 4.6 (G2, 446 reviews)**

Snov.io is a US based sales automation SaaS company offering enrichment and prospecting products including email finder API.

![snov - image20.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/snov_image20_a9ff4015e6.png "width=1631;height=677")

#### Features

* Email finder and verifier
* Multi-channel outreach tools
* Email tracking and deliverability tools
* Sales CRM
* LinkedIn automation

**Snov claims 98% accuracy** which is a bold claim. Though some users do complain about deliverability and data quality.

![snov review - image36.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/snov_review_image36_9b0e9781fa.png "width=1471;height=304")

However most of the user reviews were positive and I didn't find a lot of deliverability complaints. So **it's safe to assume that Snov is a pretty accurate product**.

But this accuracy impacts the enrichment ratio. During my testing, **Snov only collected 180 emails, which is just 18%**.

Interestingly, Snov is the 2nd fastest email finder in my list. It processed the entire dataset in **less than 18 minutes**.

The biggest turn off after enrichment rate was its API. **The documentation is pretty vague and ill-structured**.

![snov docs - image6.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/snov_docs_image6_95a04b59d0.png "width=1633;height=900")

No descriptions, just sample code and response examples that too in Python and PHP only. 

It doesn't offer a bulk search endpoint.

#### Pricing and scalability

![snov pricing - image33.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/snov_pricing_image33_35f17ebc53.png "width=1291;height=780")

* **$39 per 1000 emails**
* At scale, the prices decreases to $7.4 per 1000 emails

**There's a hard limit of 200 requests per hour** which makes the API not scalable at all.

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Affordable | Very low enrichment percentage |
| Accurate | Bad API rate limit |
| Fast | Vague documentation |
| LinkedIn automation support | |
| Multi-channel outreach | |

#### Best for

Though this list is API-focused and Snov's API is not as good as others, **it's still a good contender due to affordability and accuracy**.

**It's best suited for small businesses** looking for an affordable solution and offers complimentary LinkedIn automation too.

Not suitable for heavy requirements due to the hard rate limit.

### 7. People Data Labs

__Overall rating: 3.3__
**Rating: 4.6 (G2, 16 reviews)**

People Data Labs is a US based data company that offers people and company datasets and a developer-friendly API for data enrichment.

![pdl - image16.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/pdl_image16_d398dcb098.png "width=1509;height=772")

#### Features

* Huge leads database
* Multiple enrichment APIs
* Data licensing
* CRM and workflow automation tool integrations

The platform doesn't claim anything about deliverability, they do claim their data is verified from multiple sources and **emails are validated at the time of collection**.

But there's no real-time email validation and **I found out that some data was outdated**. User reviews also highlighted this concern.

![pdl review - image31.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/pdl_review_image31_fd03268101.png "width=1428;height=477")

It offers Bouncer integration for [email list cleaning](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/best-email-list-cleaning-services), which will definitely cost you extra.

The data enrichment rate is pretty impressive. **I got 450 professional email addresses** from the API, which is 3rd highest in this list.

The speed was average. **It processed 1000 rows in 21 minutes**.

The winning factor of People Data Labs is their API. **The API documentation is clean and very well-structured**.

![pdl docs - image25.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/pdl_docs_image25_7e54c00b15.png "width=1817;height=894")

But the API is asynchronous. It does include a bulk enrichment route which allows you to enrich **up to 100 persons per request**.

#### Pricing and scalability

![pdl pricing - image28.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/pdl_pricing_image28_4ca6cbafd3.png "width=1999;height=1329")

* **$280 per 1000 emails**
* At scale, the cost drops to $250 per 1000 emails

There's a **hard rate limit of 500 requests per minute**. 

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Well-documented API | Expensive |
| Good enrichment percentage | Hard rate limit |
| Workflow automation tools integration | Outdated data sometimes |
| Multiple enrichment APIs | No real-time email validation |
| Fast | |

#### Best for

**It's best suited for large enterprises** who can afford a tool this expensive. The rate limit can be increased if you pay more.

For small and medium enterprises, it's not a feasible option.

### 8. Icypeas

__Overall rating: 3.0__
**Rating: NA (Not listed on any trusted review site)**

Icypeas is a France-based company, focused entirely on email enrichment services. It offers a no-code platform, add-ons for other platforms, and an API too.

![icypeas - image11.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/icypeas_image11_3432dd0a42.png "width=1418;height=781")

#### Features

* Email finder, verifier, and domain search functionality
* Google Sheets add-on
* Make, Zapier, and n8n templates
* Clay and other enrichment tools integration

**Icypeas claims less than 2.5% bounce rate** due to its triple verification system. I didn't find any reviews on trusted platforms to verify these claims.

But the confidence levels are ridiculous. Even emails that might give you 35% bounce rate are tagged as verified. 

![icypeas accuracy - image26.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/icypeas_accuracy_image26_a3c2dcb873.png "width=1330;height=728")

Data enrichment rate is average. **It collected 265 verified emails**. Most of them were level 3 verified, which further makes the tool's accuracy doubtful.

The speed is pretty average. It processed my **1000 rows dataset in 21.5 minutes**.

**API documentation is clean and simple**. It doesn't have a lot of explanation or code examples but you can easily understand how it works by skimming through the docs.

![icypeas api - image39.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/icypeas_api_image39_5b6ed316bb.png "width=1871;height=884")

There is a bulk enrichment route too with up to 5000 rows per call.

**The biggest turn off for me was the asynchronous API**. Both endpoints are async.

#### Pricing and scalability

![icypeas pricing - image18.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/icypeas_pricing_image18_cba6fe56c9.png "width=1304;height=746")

* **$16.5 per 1000 emails**
* At scale, it comes down to $2.75 per 1000 emails

**There's a hard rate limit**. You get 10 requests per second on single email discovery and 1 request per second on bulk search.

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Affordable | Questionable data accuracy |
| Integration with automation tools | Async API |
| Clay integration | Hard rate limit |
| Google Sheets add-on | Low enrichment ratio |
| Low bounce rate | |

#### Best for

**Icypeas is the most affordable API in the list**, which makes it a good choice for small businesses.

Though I'm skeptical about accuracy, if you're just getting started, it can be a cost-effective option.

### 9. Dropcontact

__Overall rating: 2.7__
**Rating: 4.7 (G2, 43 reviews)**

Dropcontact is a France-based data enrichment company offering a flagship B2B email enrichment API.

![dropcontact - image37.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/dropcontact_image37_f24e86550b.png "width=1666;height=768")

#### Features

* Email finder and verifier
* CRM and workflow automation integrations
* Google Sheets enrichment add-on
* Company change alerts

**Dropcontact claims 98% valid email accuracy** and 85% catch-all email accuracy. Though these are some bold claims, it does verify the emails in real-time.

I didn't find any complaints about accuracy in user reviews either.

Enrichment rate is just okay. **I found around 383 emails using Dropcontact**, which ranks it #5 in terms of enrichment percentage.

My biggest disappointment was its speed. It's the 2nd slowest API in my list as it was able to **process 1000 rows in 149 minutes (approx 2.5 hours)**.

Not just speed, **the API itself was also a bit disappointing**. API documentation is pretty basic and not well-structured.

![dropcontact docs - image38.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/dropcontact_docs_image38_723ccb1700.png "width=1897;height=915")

**I didn't find any bulk enrichment endpoint** and the API is asynchronous.

#### Pricing and scalability

![dropcontact pricing - image19.png](https://d37gzvgyugjozl.cloudfront.net/dropcontact_pricing_image19_1caebbb9c4.png "width=1328;height=400")

* **$65 per 1000 emails**
* At scale, it goes down to $16.5 per 1000 emails

**There's a hard limit of 60 requests per second on API**.

| **Pros** | **Cons** |
|----------|----------|
| Accurate | Slow |
| Scalable | Async API |
| Good enrichment rate | Vague documentation |
| All necessary integrations | Expensive |
| API-focused | Hard rate limit |

#### Best for

**Expensive entry-level pricing makes it unsuitable** for small and medium-sized companies. At scale, it gets cheaper, so it is a good choice for enterprises.

That's it.

But what's the best email finder API for me?

## Which email finder API is best for me?

**Overall best APIs in my opinion are Anymail Finder and Findymail**. They're accurate, offer real-time verification without extra cost, and are pretty scalable.

Plus there's no hard rate limit. You just have to do some workaround to get faster API responses.

**If you need the fastest API to find verified emails, Apollo is the absolute winner**. It's literally the fastest one.

**The cheapest email finder API would be Icypeas**. From entry-level to highest pricing tiers, it offers the cheapest cost per 1000 emails.

## Conclusion

That's a wrap on **best email finder APIs of 2025**. If I missed any good API or if you want me to explore any related topic, [ping me on LinkedIn](https://linkedin.com/in/shehriar-ahmad-awan).

---

## Scrapers in this article

- [Google Maps Leads Scraper](https://www.lobstr.io/store/google-maps-leads-scraper): Scrape all local businesses data from a Google Maps Search URL and export into a Google Sheet. Emails included. (1 credit per result)
- [Facebook Pages Search Export](https://www.lobstr.io/store/facebook-pages-search-export): Scrape all Facebook Pages data from a Search URL and export it to googlesheet. #phone and @mail included! (1 credit per result)
- [Facebook Business Page Scraper](https://www.lobstr.io/store/facebook-business-page-scraper): Collect publicly available information from any Facebook business page — including email and phone when listed. (1 credit per result)
- [Sales Navigator Leads Scraper](https://www.lobstr.io/store/sales-navigator-leads-scraper): Extract emails and phones from LinkedIn Sales Navigator at scale — no code, no hassle, easy. (1 credit per result)

## Related articles

- [10+ Best Email List Cleaning Services [2025 Edition]](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/best-email-list-cleaning-services)
- [5+ Best LinkedIn Email Extractor Tools of 2024 [No-Code]](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/best-linkedin-email-extractor)
- [Google Maps Email Extractor: Free, No Code, Proven (214,361 Listings)](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/google-maps-email-extractor)
- [How to Extract Emails from LinkedIn Sales Navigator in 2024 [No-Code]](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/extract-emails-from-linkedin)
- [I Compared Best Cold Email Software of 2025](https://www.lobstr.io/blog/best-cold-email-software)

Tags: Code, Use Cases, Tutorials

_Canonical HTML: https://www.lobstr.io/blog/email-finder-api_

More for agents: https://www.lobstr.io/llms.txt, pricing in Markdown: https://www.lobstr.io/pricing.md